We're a geek culture podcast and blog covering video games, music, food and more. We are the kinds of people who evangelize whatever we are into - it could be anything - but it's usually pretty geeky.

editor-in-chief
chris furniss

current contributors
qais fulton
jinny koh
max brooks
michael wiegand
ross rosenberg
john forster
ryan g. biv

meta

mailbag

Feed our mailbag and get your letter read on air!

feed it!

    recommended distractions

    Really Saving The World

    red_cros_game.jpg

    You know what I think would be great? If gamers stopped being so damn selfish, collectively removed themselves from their couches for once, and used all that energy they spend playing games for the betterment of mankind. Wait, no, I don't think that, the Red Cross thinks that, or at least that's the implication given by their latest ad. The reason I don't think that? Gamers are are spending time, money, and effort to make the world a better place to live, and we're doing it with the thing we most love, games.

    Now I'll be the first to admit that I can get a little reactionary when it seems like someone that isn't "hip to the lingo" is using games as a scapegoat or device in their advertising to drive people to action. And this ad by the Lebanese Red Cross is really clever, well designed, and is ultimately advocating something that I am behind 100%, but lumping gamers into the mix to make their point because it's convenient causes exactly what they're trying to avoid to occur; it's a divisive message and is going to make those of us sensitive to this kind of thing less likely to lend aid to their cause.

    Thankfully, those of us that are now unwilling to lend aid to the Red Cross are likely still involved in any number of the multitude of charitable organizations run by and for gamers and the rest of the world. There are organizations such as Child's Play which donates games, books and toys to sick children across the world, Folding@Home which can be run in the background on a PC or a PS3 and distributes computer processing across the globe in order to better understand the evolution of viruses, or Gifts From Gamers which sends consoles, games, DVDs, CDs, books and magazines to soldiers currently stationed on the front lines. That last one is interesting considering the International Red Cross' roots are in assisting soldiers during war time. Seems the Lebanese Red Cross is a little late in their appeal, we've been on point helping those that need it for years now, especially soldiers.

    Again I'd like to state that I don't disagree with the Red Cross' underlying message, we should be saving the world for real. The world is a horrible place full of violence, illness, tragedy, and horror, and we as human beings have a responsibility to put an end to that. The thing is though, we are, and we have been for a long time without any other unifying factors in place except that we all enjoy gaming and we aren't the shallow, thoughtless gang that we're often painted as. Take a look at gamers as a whole and you'll find an incredibly diverse group of people, a group that has put aside any differences it might have in order to help those in need. How many other charitable organizations can you think of whose members ignore the boundaries of race, age, gender, sexuality, and religion simply so they can give aid and make the world a better place to sit on your couch for hours at a time, seemingly doing nothing but accomplishing so much?

    We all want to help, that much is obvious, but alienating gamers isn't the best way to get that help, no matter how many ignorant cause-heads titter at your clever joke.

    Read More: , , , ,

    comments (12) | permalink

    ChrisAuthor Profile Page says:

    posted April 9, 2008 2:00 PM

    I don't really see the ad as *too* inflammatory, though I tend to feel the same indignant gamer rage whenever I see something like this. We are already doing many things, and tend to be very generous people.

    Mellzah says:

    posted April 9, 2008 4:48 PM

    I honestly don't see the offense here; if anything, I think that the ad speaks to the fact that gaming has become so mainstream that a large percentage of people will understand the message and have it resonate.

    Sometimes I think it's difficult for the hardcore gamers to comprehend how much gaming crosses age/income/race/creed brackets, and considering it has become a huge part of our culture at large, not everyone is out to mock you, regardless of what Jack Thompson might make you believe.

    If you go looking for offense, you'll find it. The gaming community at large is extremely good at this.

    QaisAuthor Profile Page says:

    posted April 9, 2008 5:09 PM

    My interpretation is as follows: The ad shows a DS with the words "Really Save The World", seemingly implying that by playing your DS (and thus games in general) you aren't "saving the world".

    The logical extension of that statement is that by gaming you aren't doing anything to help, but that by joining the Red Cross you can really make a difference.

    I sure as shit don't need to join a religious organization to be a charitable, community minded person and I resent the implication that by being a gamer I'm not doing my part to mend the ills of the world.

    Additionally, I specifically mention just how amazing it is that gaming crosses so many social barriers. Because it's true, and again shows that the Red Cross is not only wrong in it's subtle assertion but that we as gamers don't need them to do right by the world.

    Sitnalta says:

    posted April 10, 2008 12:15 AM

    I think you're reading too much into it. It's just a clever illustration.

    And you have to admit that actually delivering medical aid, food and other supplies to desperate people is more productive, and indeed helpful, than playing a video game. That's the basic thesis behind the ad. Nothing more.

    Also, what does Child's Play actually do? It says on their site that they donate toys, games, books and cash to sick kids, but that's pretty nebulous. Are there any specifics on what actual good it does?

    ChrisAuthor Profile Page says:

    posted April 11, 2008 1:34 PM

    I'm in agreement with miss Mellzah. We gamers do tend to knee-jerk quite often. But so do most pop culture obsessed groups. We are nerds. Nerd rage is notorious.

    MackAuthor Profile Page says:

    posted April 13, 2008 1:52 PM

    My interpretation is as follows: The ad shows a DS with the words "Really Save The World", seemingly implying that by playing your DS (and thus games in general) you aren't "saving the world".

    The logical extension of that statement is that by gaming you aren't doing anything to help, but that by joining the Red Cross you can really make a difference.

    Wait wait wait, you're saying that if I play my DS I'm NOT saving the world!? I suppose this means that I'm not really a surgeon either!

    You're right Qais, the Red Cross hasn't done more in the world to help people who need it than people playing video games have. Just think of all those starving people who go to open their care packages from the Red Cross, only to be disappointed that they contain food and drinking water tablets instead of a dude playing Mario Kart.

    ChrisAuthor Profile Page says:

    posted April 13, 2008 9:32 PM

    "saving the world" is not objective, it's subjective and arguable. You can't say that someone who needs help from the red cross is any more "needy" than a kid with cancer.

    MackAuthor Profile Page says:

    posted April 14, 2008 12:15 AM

    I think their point is that there are more productive things to do to help "save the world" than to PLAY video games. Playing video games actually accomplishes nothing, is that up for debate?

    ChrisAuthor Profile Page says:

    posted April 14, 2008 8:28 AM

    So does watching TV, movies, riding your bike, painting, drawing, etc. Any hobby effectively accomplishes nothing. Things really just aren't all that black and white, and the Red Cross certainly wasn't thinking this deeply about the ad, I can guarantee you. If they really wanted to get people who play video games to "really save the world" they probably shouldn't have insinuated that our hobby is meaningless.

    Miles says:

    posted April 14, 2008 2:32 PM

    Um, what? The joke of the ad is that in video games a lot of time you are pretending to save the world. You don't pretend you're saving the world when you watch TV or paint. It's not insinuating that videogaming as a hobby is any less meaningful than any other hobby -- it's just the only mainstream hobby where you pretend to save the world and so they can make a clever ad about it.

    mrsleep says:

    posted April 16, 2008 2:45 PM

    Hey, how about going after the people who could actually affect change in the world, like, say the politicians and richie riches, who got that way by stepping on the poor and disadvantaged?

    No, it makes perfect sense to go after gamers.

    Osama says:

    posted August 8, 2008 9:33 AM

    I think "playing games" does accomplish something. It keeps people off the street. That's less people stealing, murdering, raping etc...

    What say you?!

    fresh podcasts

    more podcasts

    new chatter

    tag cloud

    feeling generous?

    The Weekly Geek is done on a zero budget, with no funding other than ads and merch. Help support the site with a donation! Consider it like tipping your waiter. We also give gifts for larger donations.

    One time donation:
    Monthly Donation: